天天网官方

<bdo id="ug3eo"><b id="ug3eo"></b></bdo>

  • <tt id="ug3eo"><source id="ug3eo"><td id="ug3eo"></td></source></tt>
  • <bdo id="ug3eo"><input id="ug3eo"><p id="ug3eo"></p></input></bdo>

  • <bdo id="ug3eo"><b id="ug3eo"><tr id="ug3eo"></tr></b></bdo>

      DBMS product categories

      Analysis of database management technology in specific product categories. Related subjects include:

      June 16, 2017

      Generally available Kudu

      I talked with Cloudera about Kudu in early May. Besides giving me a lot of information about Kudu, Cloudera also helped confirm some trends I’m seeing elsewhere, including:

      Now let’s talk about Kudu itself. As I discussed at length in September 2015, Kudu is:

      Kudu’s adoption and roll-out story starts: Read more

      March 12, 2017

      Introduction to SequoiaDB and SequoiaCM

      For starters, let me say:

      Also:

      Unfortunately, SequoiaDB has not captured a lot of detailed information about unpaid open source production usage.

      Read more

      December 18, 2016

      Introduction to Crate.io and CrateDB

      Crate.io and CrateDB basics include:

      In essence, CrateDB is an open source and less mature alternative to MemSQL. The opportunity for MemSQL and CrateDB alike exists in part because analytic RDBMS vendors didn’t close it off.

      CrateDB’s not-just-relational story starts:

      Read more

      November 23, 2016

      MongoDB 3.4 and “multimodel” query

      “Multimodel” database management is a hot new concept these days, notwithstanding that it’s been around since at least the 1990s. My clients at MongoDB of course had to join the train as well, but they’ve taken a clear and interesting stance:

      When I pointed out that it would make sense to call this “multimodel query” — because the storage isn’t “multimodel” at all — they quickly agreed.

      To be clear: While there are multiple ways to read data in MongoDB, there’s still only one way to write it. Letting that sink in helps clear up confusion as to what about MongoDB is or isn’t “multimodel”. To spell that out a bit further: Read more

      August 28, 2016

      Are analytic RDBMS and data warehouse appliances obsolete?

      I used to spend most of my time — blogging and consulting alike — on data warehouse appliances and analytic DBMS. Now I’m barely involved with them. The most obvious reason is that there have been drastic changes in industry structure:

      Simply reciting all that, however, begs the question of whether one should still care about analytic RDBMS at all.

      My answer, in a nutshell, is:

      Analytic RDBMS — whether on premises in software, in the form of data warehouse appliances, or in the cloud — are still great for hard-core business intelligence, where “hard-core” can refer to ad-hoc query complexity, reporting/dashboard concurrency, or both. But they aren’t good for much else.

      Read more

      August 21, 2016

      Introduction to data Artisans and Flink

      data Artisans and Flink basics start:

      Like many open source projects, Flink seems to have been partly inspired by a Google paper.

      To this point, data Artisans and Flink have less maturity and traction than Databricks and Spark. For example:? Read more

      August 21, 2016

      More about Databricks and Spark

      Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi checked in because he disagreed with part of my recent post about Databricks. Ali’s take on Databricks’ position in the Spark world includes:

      Ali also walked me through customer use cases and adoption in wonderful detail. In general:

      The story on those sectors, per Ali, is:? Read more

      July 19, 2016

      Notes on vendor lock-in

      Vendor lock-in is an important subject. Everybody knows that. But few of us realize just how complicated the subject is, nor how riddled it is with paradoxes. Truth be told, I wasn’t fully aware either. But when I set out to write this post, I found that it just kept growing longer.

      1. The most basic form of lock-in is:

      2. Enterprise vendor standardization is closely associated with lock-in. The core idea is that you have a mandate or strong bias toward having different apps run over the same platforms, because:

      3. That last point is double-edged; you have more power over suppliers to whom you give more business, but they also have more power over you. The upshot is often an ELA (Enterprise License Agreement), which commonly works:

      Read more

      July 19, 2016

      Notes from a long trip, July 19, 2016

      For starters:

      A running list of recent posts is:

      Subjects I’d like to add to that list include:

      Read more

      January 25, 2016

      Kafka and Confluent

      For starters:

      At its core Kafka is very simple:

      So it seems fair to say:

      Read more

      Next Page →

      Feed: DBMS (database management system), DW (data warehousing), BI (business intelligence), and analytics technology Subscribe to the Monash Research feed via RSS or email:

      Login

      Search our blogs and white papers

      Monash Research blogs

      User consulting

      Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.

      Vendor advisory

      We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.

      Monash Research highlights

      Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email.

      <bdo id="ug3eo"><b id="ug3eo"></b></bdo>

    1. <tt id="ug3eo"><source id="ug3eo"><td id="ug3eo"></td></source></tt>
    2. <bdo id="ug3eo"><input id="ug3eo"><p id="ug3eo"></p></input></bdo>

    3. <bdo id="ug3eo"><b id="ug3eo"><tr id="ug3eo"></tr></b></bdo>

        必网赢

        梦之城棋牌

        上海体育彩票网

        大发888bet手机版

        鸿丰app

        阳光在线官方

        天津体育彩票网官网

        网上在线打鱼

        彩客竞彩彩票官网apple